Berkshire Hathaway's net earnings surged due to investment gains, but GEICO's underwriting income plummeted, signaling potential rate adjustments.

Berkshire Hathaway reported net earnings of $25.7 billion in Q2, marking a significant rise from the $12.4 billion posted in the same quarter last year. This sharp increase primarily stems from $12.7 billion in investment gains, which the company cautions should not be viewed as reflective of its operational health.
When examining operating earnings, a better indicator of the firm's ongoing business performance, there was a more modest increase to $13.0 billion from $11.2 billion year-over-year.
Mixed Results from Insurance Operations
The insurance sector presents a mixed picture. GEICO's underwriting income took a substantial hit, down 45.4% year over year to $994 million. This decline contrasts with Allstate's improved performance in the same timeframe, highlighting divergent strategies in the face of shared industry pressures, particularly rising bodily injury claims severity.
GEICO reported a combined ratio that worsened by 7.7 percentage points to 91.2%, with its loss ratio climbing to 76.6%. This uptick is largely attributed to increased frequency and severity of claims. Specifically, bodily injury claim severity jumped by 10% to 12%, while frequency rose by 5% to 7% during the first half of this year.
Interestingly, the year-over-year figures are somewhat favorable due to contrasting catastrophe experiences; whereas the first half of 2025 involved significant losses related to the Southern California wildfires, the first half of 2026 has seen no comparable catastrophic events.
In contrast, Allstate's property-liability combined ratio improved by 4.5 points to 86.6% during the same quarter, aided by $1.5 billion in auto reserve releases, approximately half of which relates to bodily injury claims from 2023 and 2024 accident years.
Industry Trends and Implications for Brokers
Allstate’s leadership points out the continued industry-wide pressure from elevated bodily injury claims, yet they indicate sufficient pricing margins to absorb these inflation effects without necessitating problematic rate hikes. As Jesse Merten, Allstate’s president of property-liability, stated, while physical damage severities are starting to stabilize, the trends for bodily injuries remain concerning.
Away from GEICO, other parts of Berkshire's insurance operations are faring well. The Berkshire Hathaway Primary Group noted a pre-tax underwriting earnings leap of 333% to $273 million. Similarly, the property and casualty reinsurance group saw an 8.9% increase to $1.14 billion, buoyed by favorable reserve developments and a lack of major catastrophe losses.
This varying performance highlights that brokers placing commercial risks are currently facing more favorable conditions on the reinsurance-backed and primary commercial side than they are on the personal auto retail side, where profitability is under greater strain due to rising claims severity.
Importantly, the improvement in Allstate's combined ratio largely stems from capital released from older claims that performed better than anticipated, rather than current quarter pricing adjustments. Brokers advising clients should be cautious; a strong headline combined ratio can sometimes mask operational realities driven by accounting practices.
Anticipating Future Rate Adjustments
The disparities in GEICO’s underwriting performance underline that while common industry challenges exist, outcomes are not uniform across players. The drop in GEICO's underwriting income this quarter signals that company-specific reserving and pricing strategies are as influential as broader market pressures.
Brokers handling personal auto business should be prepared to explain that saying "the market is hardening" isn’t sufficient for clients renewing quotes. The focus should be on which companies are effectively managing bodily injury severity through disciplined pricing and reserving strategies, and which are not.
With GEICO's significant reduction in underwriting income, it’s reasonable to expect forthcoming rate changes as a direct response to the pressures of rising claims. Brokers with GEICO-insured clients or those competing with GEICO should proactively communicate the likelihood of firmer rates, rather than waiting for renewal notices to deliver potential surprises.
This issue of severity extends beyond personal auto insurance, impacting commercial lines as well. Factors such as escalating medical costs and increased legal involvement in claims—often referred to as social inflation—are driving up pricing across the board in general liability and umbrella coverage.
Brokers advising commercial clients on excess liability should interpret these personal auto trends as validation that litigation-induced severity is an ongoing concern throughout the industry, rather than something that is subsiding.
Discussion
Sign in to join the discussion.